W stands for Woops

Woops, didn't prevent 9/11. Woops, didn't get Bin Ladin. Woops, didn't prevent 1000 Katrine deaths. Woops, no WMDs. Woops, 4000+ soldier deaths. Woops, 500,000+ iraqi deaths. Woops, financial meltdown. Woops, should NEVER have been president.

I am writing this because W said in his last interview, "I wasn't prepared for war." That's like saying, "Woops, I wasn't prepare to be president." W acted like being president was just another job, with weekends off. Cheney even allowed W to have elementary school duty, on 9/11, so there wouldn't be any mistakes on W's part that day (WTC7 = inside job).

Top Ten Reasons "Palin is Bush"

#10 What's the difference between Palin and Bush.... lipstick.

#9 Palin and Bush were both governors of big oil producing states with strong ties to the oil industry.

#8 Palin and Bush are just plain likable: the soccer mom and the boy scout sheriff. Sarah winks and W grins like a puppy dog.

#7 Palin and Bush are both extremely loyal, so they reward supporters by putting them in positions that they are unqualified for.

#6 Palin and Bush are good at reading speeches prepared by professional speech-writers. They are just actors reading other people's words, and the gullible buy it.

#5 Palin and Bush know so little that they show their ignorance when they say what they really think.

#4 Palin and Bush both have egos so big that they think that they can do anything and don't even realize that they are unqualified to be President of the United States.

#3 Palin and Bush are two decent humans who ascended to positions of leadership that were beyond their capabilities, so they ended up descending into bigger and bigger disasters.

#2 Palin and Bush are just puppets of the neo-cons. Their lack of intellect makes it easy for neo-cons to advise/manage/control them.

#1 The same people who like Palin also liked Bush enough to vote for him twice.

Fire Cheney and Bush

I'd like to teach you a song. It only has four words which make up its title. It has to do with our first amendment, free speech rights. People say that our free speech rights do not include the right to yell "Fire" in a crowded room, because the resulting panic might lead to injuries or deaths. Here is what Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote:

The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. [...] The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.

I'd like to make you aware that our VP and President yelled the equivalent of "Fire", in many crowded rooms, which led to injuries and deaths in Iraq. In 2003, Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction, no links to Al Qaeda, no nuclear bomb program; yet Cheney and Bush spoke loudly and often that he did, which was like yelling "Fire". The resulting panic directly led to tens of thousands of maiming and deaths, and we should "Fire Cheney and Bush". This is what the Supreme Court has said, this is what Congress should do, and this is what the people must demand. If a man who falsely shouts "fire" in a theater should go to jail, then Cheney and Bush need to at least be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Sing this song everywhere, loud and clear, "Fire Cheney and Bush".